CONTINUED FROM VINAYA RULES/WEE NEE…III

Phopyoncho
Posted on: 2008/8/9 23:31
Thanks for the previous postings. I will like to add something.

On 12/2/07, Kyawhtin1 had commented about “Azusa Temple’s “PBA” SECRETARY” in link below:

http://myanmargazette.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=330&forum=20&post_id=853

He was warning Azusa Temple about “PBA” SECRETARY position’s ILLEGALITY under its Bylaws. The Bylaws provided for an “EC” Secretary NOT another “PBA” Secretary.

He pointed out that even changing Bylaws later to create a PBA SECRETARY position would involve extra compliance works. For example, they would involve IRS Tax exempt permit re-submissions and potential IRS rejection. These could hurt donors and Temple. He pointed out that it’s just ILLEGAL and that it’s exposing the TEMPLE and DONORS to unnecessary RISKS.

“BOARD SECRETARY” Extract:

“Mandalay Gazette newspaper, November issue, page 2, carried an article on the Azusa Temple “Pa Htan” recital. Near the end, it mentioned that a….. BOARD SECRETARY expressed thanks to attendees.”

About 6 months later, Myittha and Kyawhtin1 reminded Azusa Temple again in their 5/23 and 5/24/08 postings below:

http://myanmargazette.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=330&forum=20&post_id=1961

http://myanmargazette.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=thread&topic_id=330&forum=20&post_id=1980

Furthermore, for 8 months up to now Azusa website azusapba.org still carries the following “PBA” SECRETARY photo. It was posted since 11/13/07 and is still misleading the public, click below:

CONTINUED BELOW

About Myittha

Myit tha has written 15 post in this Website..