“တရုတ္ၾကီး အဟုတ္တီး ခံရေတာ႕မည္ေလာ….. knock-out” ဆိုျပီး စာေရးသူ တဦး က ပုံေတြနဲ႕ေရးတင္ခဲ့တာကို ေအာက္ပါလင့္မွာ ၾကည့္ႏိုင္

http://myanmargazette.net/82126/economic-news-international-news-news-industry-people-in-the-news-us-news-news/world-news

” ျငိမ္းျငိမ္းခ်မ္းခ်မ္း ျဖစ္ေစခ်င္ပါတယ္” ဆိုျပီးေတာ့လဲ

“တရုတ္ထီး ေတပါေစ၊ တရုတ္မ ေနပါေစ ” လို႕လဲ ဆိုျပန္ခဲ့တယ္

“တရုတ္  မၾကိဳက္သူ ……ၾကီး” လို႕လည္ေကာင္း၊ “တရုတ္(ထီး)ဆန္႕က်င္သမား …..ၾကီး”  လို႕ လည္ေကာင္း

မိမိကိုမိမိ သမုတ္ ျပန္တယ္

 

“ျမန္မာျပည္ဆင္းရဲျခင္းအေၾကာင္း China factor” ေခါင္းစဥ္နဲ႕ တ႐ုပ္ၾကီး ေၾကာင့္ဆိုျပီး ထင္ေၾကးနဲ႕ အေခ်ာက္တိုက္ အျပစ္ဖို႕ ခဲ့ေသးတယ္၊

http://myanmargazette.net/78073/economic-news-international-news-news-industry-people-in-the-news-us-news-news/myanmar-burma-burmese-bama-myanmarian-myanma-news

အေထာက္အထား မျပႏိုင္ဘဲနဲ႕အလကားေနရင္း အိမ္နီးခ်င္းႏိုင္ငံနဲ႕ရန္ေတြ႕ရေအာင္လံႈ႕ေဆာ္ခဲ့ျပန္တယ္ 

 

ဖားတုလို႕ခ႐ုခုန္….. အေမရိကန္ကိုတုလို႕တ႐ုတ္ႀကီးက ခုန္အံုးမယ္တဲ့ဗ်ာ… ကြန္မန္႕မွာလဲ

” တရုတ္ၾကီး ငရုတ္သီး အဟုတ္တီး ျပဳတ္သတည္း” ျဖစ္သြားႏုိင္တာကို ထည့္တြက္ဖုိ႕ မေမ႕သင့္ဘူးထင္ပါတယ္လို႕လဲေရးခဲ့ျပန္

http://myanmargazette.net/75583/economic-news-international-news-news-industry-people-in-the-news-us-news-news

စသည္ျဖင့္ ရြာထိတ္ကေနရမ္းကားေနခဲ့ေပတယ္

 

“တရုတ္ၾကီး အဟုတ္တီး ခံရေတာ႕မည္ေလာ….. knock-out”  ေဆာင္း ပါး ေအာက္နားမွာ “ကို blackchaw” က

” အဟမ္းအဟမ္း (ေခ်ာင္းဟန္႔ေနတာနဲ႔ ေျပာခ်င္တာေပ်ာက္သြားတယ္ဗ်ိဳ႕)။
တရုတ္ဘက္က ျပန္ေရးမယ္႔သူေတြ ရွိရင္ ဖိတ္ေခၚပါတယ္ေနာ..။”

လို႕ ေတာင္းဆိုခဲ့တယ္မဟုတ္လား၊

 

တ႐ုပ္ဘက္သာမကဘဲ ဘက္စုံေအာင္ အျခား အေမရိကန္ နဲ႕ကမ္ဘာ့ပညာရွင္ ႏိုင္ငံေရး ပါရဂူေတြ နဲ႕ႏိုင္ငံေရးကာတြန္းဆရာေတြ ရဲ့အျမင္ေပါင္းစံုကိုမန္းေဂဇက္ရြာသား တို႕အတြက္ အတတ္ႏိုင္ဆုံး တင္ ျပသြားမွာျဖစ္ပါတယ္

 

 

အေမရိကန္က တ႐ုပ္ၾကီးကိုေႂကြး တင္တာက ၁,၄၀၀,၀၀၀သန္း ေဒၚလာ (သန္းေပါင္း ၁.၄သန္း 1,400,000,000,000) ရွိျပီး ကိုယ့္ေႂကြးရွင္ကိုသြားရန္ေတြ႕ဘို႕မ လို၊ ရန္ေတြ႕လို႕မလြယ္

 

အေမရိကန္ နဲ႕အေနာက္ႏိုင္ငံက ေနာက္ ေျပာင္ သေရာ္ ေနၾကတဲ့ ႏိုင္ငံေရးကာတြန္း ေတြကို႐ႉစားခံစားႏိုင္ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

၂၀၁၁ခုႏွစ္၊ ႏွစ္ဦးပိုင္း တ႐ုပ္သမတ ဟူဂ်င္ေတာင္ အေမရိကန္ သို႕သြားေရာက္စဥ္က ျဖစ္တယ္

 

 

က်ဳပ္ကို ထုံးတမ္းစဥ္လာအတိုင္း ရာထူးရာခံနဲ႕လိပ္မူတပ္ျပီးေခၚေဝၚေနဘို႕မလိုပါ၊ က်ဳပ္ကို (ခင္ဗ်ားတို႕ရဲ့) " ေျမပိုင္ရွင္" လို႕ ႐ိုး႐ိုးဘဲေခၚႏိုင္ပါတယ္

 

 

 

 

 

 "ဟူး" ဆိုတာ ဘယ္သူလဲ လို႕အဓိပ္ပါယ္ ထြက္ ျပီး "ဟူဂ်င္ေတာင္ က" လို႕လဲ အဓိပ္ပါယ္ ထြက္ တာ

သင္ရဲ့ေငြရွင္ၾကီး သူေဌး က ဘယ္သူလဲ?
ဟူဂ်င္ေတာင္ က ဘဲ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္
လို႕ အေမး နဲ႕အေျဖ ကို တေၾကာင္းနဲ႕ေက် ညာ ျပီးသား

 

 

Friends Chat – Group Favorite: @Fun12 – Funny Cartoons – When China’s President visits USA

http://friends-speak.blogspot.com/2011/08/fun12-funny-cartoons-when-chinas.html

ခဏေလးေလာက္ ၾကားျဖတ္ျပီး ႏိုင္ငံေရး အက်ဥ္းသားမ်ားအေၾကာင္း ေျပာႏိုင္မလား

ခုလာတာက က်ဳပ္တို႕ရဲ့ ရင္းႏွီးျမႇဳပ္ႏွံ မႈပစ္စည္းေတြကိုစီစစ္ဘို႕ဘဲ

Funny Cartoons – When China’s President visits USA ~ Share Good Stuffs

http://www.sharegoodstuffs.com/2011/08/funny-cartoons-when-chinas-president.html

သမတဂ်ာ့ဝါရွင္တန္က ႏိုင္ငံ ေတာ္ေႂကြးျမီ တင္တာမၾကိဳက္တာသိလို႕ သူ႕ပံုေရွ႕လဲေရာက္ေရာ္ ဧည့္သည္ေတာ္ တ႐ုပ္သမတက စိတ္ထဲမွာ တခိခိနဲ႕ရယ္ခ်င္

အာလူးေက်ာ္ ဝက္သားေပါက္စီနဲ႕ဘိလပ္ေရ တို႕နဲ႕ဘဲ ဖေယာင္းတိုင္ေတြ ထြန္းျပီး ႐ိုး႐ိုး တည္ခင္းဧည့္ခံ တာကို
ဧည့္သည္က" ၾကည့္စမ္း ခင္ဗ်ား ေငြထပ္ေခ်းဘို႕လိုရင္ ေျပာေရာေပါ့ဗ်ာ"

Funny Cartoons – When China’s President visits USA | JustChillz : It’s Different

http://justchillz.in/2011/08/funny-cartoons-when-chinas-president-visits-usa/

ဧည့္သည္ကို တိုင္းျပည္တဝွမ္းလိုက္ျပျပီးေနာက္ အိမ္ရွင္ကေမး တာ

"ကဲ၊ျမင္တဲ့အတိုင္းဘဲ ေျပာင္လက္ေနတဲ့ တဘက္ပင္လယ္ကမ္းေျခမွေနျပီး ေနာက္တဘက္ရွိပင္လယ္ကမ္းေျခ အထိပါဘဲ၊
ဘယ္လိုျမင္ပါသလဲ?"

ဧည့္သည္ ကသူ႕ဟာသူေတြးေနတာ၊

"သူမသိတာက ငါ ကဒါေတြအားလုံးကိုပိုင္ေနတာ"

 


ဖဲ ရွုံးတာ ေငြေတြမက ဘဲ ဦးထုပ္ ေဘာင္းဘီ အင္းက်ီ ဘိနပ္ ပါ မက်န္အကုန္ေျပာင္ေတာ့တာ


ေငြ ေၾကး ထိန္းသိမ္း သိုေလွာင္ရာ ဘဏ္ဋာ ေရးဝန္ၾကီးဌာနအေစာက္အအံုအေပၚသို႕ တ႐ုပ္အေဆာက္အဦ ပုံစံေရာက္ လာ



စားပြဲအျပီးလက္ေဆာင္အျဖစ္ေပးတဲ့   မုန္႕ကြၽတ္ ထဲက ေဗဒင္ေဟာစာတမ္း ကေလး မွာ ေရးထားတာက



” ေႂကြးတင္တဲ့ ေငြေခ်းသူသည္ ေႂကြးေပးသူ ေငြရွင္၏ေက်းကြၽန္ သာလွ်င္ ျဖစ္တယ္”

China’s President Hu Jintao visits the US during the debt crisis …(cartoons)

http://www.funonthenet.in/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,36/topic,213778.0

 

 

The Official James Petras website » Obama Raises the Military Stakes: Confrontation on the Frontiers of China and Russia

12.07.2011 :: United States

Introduction: After suffering major military and political defeats in bloody ground wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and failing to buttress long-standing clients in Yemen, Egypt and Tunisia and witnessing the disintegration of puppet regimes in Somalia and South Sudan, the Obama regime has learned nothing: instead he has turned toward greater military confrontation with global powers, namely Russia and China. Obama has adopted a provocative offensive military strategy on the very frontiers of both China and Russia.

After going from defeat to defeat on the periphery of world power and not satisfied with running treasury-busting deficits in pursuit of empire building against economically weak countries, Obama has embraced a policy of encirclement and provocations against China, the world’s second largest economy and the US’s most important creditor, and Russia the European Union’s principle oil and gas provider and the world’s second most powerful nuclear weapons power.

This paper addresses the Obama regime’s highly irrational and world threatening escalation of imperial militarism. We examine the global military, economic and domestic political context that gives rise to these policies. We then examine the multiple points of conflict and intervention in which Washington is engaged, from Pakistan, Iran, Libya, Venezuela, Cuba and beyond. We will then analyze the rationale for military escalation against Russia and China as part of a new ‘offensive moving beyond the Arab world (Syria, Libya) and in the face of the declining economic position of the EU and the US in the global economy. We will then outline the strategies of a declining empire nurtured on perpetual wars, facing global economic decline, domestic discredit and a working population facing long-term large scale rollback of basic social programs.

The Turn from Militarism in the Periphery to Global Military Confrontation

November 2011 is a moment of great historical import. Obama declared two major policy positions, both having tremendous strategic consequences affecting competing world powers.

Obama pronounced a policy of military encirclement of China based on stationing a maritime, aerial armada facing the Chinese coast. A policy designed to weaken and disrupt China’s access to raw materials and commercial and financial ties in Asia. Obama’s declaration that Asia is the priority region for US military expansion, base building and economic alliances was directed against China, challenging Beijing in its own backyard. Obama’s iron fist policy statement, addressed to the Australian Parliament, was crystal clear in defining US imperial goals.

“Our enduring interests in the region [Asia Pacific] demands our enduring presence in this region … The United States is a Pacific power and we are here to stay … As we end today’s wars [the defeats and retreats from Iraq and Afghanistan]… I have directed my national security team to make our presence and missions in the Asia Pacific a top priority … As a result reduction in US defense spending will not … come at the expense of the Asia Pacific” (CNN.com, Nov. 16, 2011).

 gulftoday.ae | Andrew Quinn: Piling pressure on China, risking US 2012 election

http://gulftoday.ae/portal/12a13b12-c276-4254-82ed-108ac1680bd8.aspx

Andrew Quinn: Piling pressure on China, risking US 2012 election

….“The candidates are going to try to out-tough each other on China, because that plays well,” said one business analyst with China connections who did not want to be named. “But there is no way of addressing these issues bilaterally without causing a lot of collateral damage, so they have to do a lot of soul searching about what comes next.”

While White House officials say Obama told Chinese President Hu Jintao that American business and American people were “impatient and frustrated” with China’s economic policies, China has shown no public sign of backing down.

A senior Chinese diplomat at the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) summit in Hawaii said Beijing would abide by rules made collectively but would not be dictated to when it comes to international trade rules. Political analysts said China’s leaders, preparing to install Vice-President Xi Jinping as Hu’s successor in the second half of 2012, are under their own domestic political pressure and unlikely to cave in to US demands.

“Right up through the end of 2012 the Chinese leaders are going to have to look holier than the Pope or more communist than Mao when it comes to their response to pressure on China,” said Douglas Paal, an expert on Asia at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a senior Asia advisor to the Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush administrations. “You will probably see less co-operation on currency revaluation and on other things we want, and I don’t think that pushing them hard in public will make it any better.”

Nye: Obama’s Pacific pivot – Global Public Square – CNN.com Blogs

http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2011/12/07/nye-obamas-pacific-pivot/

Nye: Obama’s Pacific pivot

Editor’s Note: Joseph Nye, a former U.S. assistant secretary of defense, is a professor at Harvard and the author of The Future of Power. For more from Nye, visit Project Syndicate or follow it on Facebook and Twitter.

But American policy toward China is different from Cold War containment of the Soviet bloc. Whereas the U.S. and the Soviet Union had limited trade and social contact, the U.S. is China’s largest overseas market, welcomed and facilitated China’s entry into the World Trade Organization, and opens its universities’ gates to 125,000 Chinese students each year. If current U.S. policy towards China is supposed to be Cold War-style containment, it seems unusually warm….

….But the last thing the U.S. wants is a Cold War II in Asia.

Whatever the two sides’ competitive positions, Sino-American cooperation on issues like trade, financial stability, energy security, climate change, and pandemics will benefit both countries. The rest of the region stands to gain, too. The Obama administration’s pivot towards Asia signals recognition of the region’s great potential, not a clarion call for containment.

The views expressed in this article are solely those of Joe Nye. 

 Comments မွာဆက္ဘတ္ႏိုင္ရန္

About Kyaemon

Kyae Mon has written 706 post in this Website..

Likes to post news and educational items.