This is what I sent to UN
Shwe Phyucontactnewscentre@un.org
UN Secretary-General & Mr Quintana,
Every coin has two sides but for UN, you only look at one side. If UN is the organization for Human no matter their race or religion, why did you leave Maungdaw at the first place where people needed you most. You can ask any of your employee based in Maungdaw (apart from Muslims as you will hear only their side) or even Rakhine if you think you will hear only one side too about who were real victims of that violence.
If Taliban believe the propaganda from Muslims website with pictures of poor infants burnt down, it’s OK as they will believe anything that the islamic brotherhoods say but for an organization like UN & AI believing one side stories and those propagandas, it’s a shame for those organizations. When US hunted down Binladin in Pakistan, where were those organizations to say something about it? India has same problem at their border recently and the Indian Govt ordered “Shoot-on-sight” to protect their ethnic group from those terrorists but can you go and tell India it’s about human right???? If Myanmar Govt had used that “Shoot-on-sight” order when the violence happened to Maungdaw, Sittwe would have been well saved but NO… They did only warning shots and your organization as well as US and other organization even praised Myanmar Govt of handling that case, if you remember but the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, has referred (according to her) independent sources saying another story of Myanmar forces abusing Rohingya. What are be supposed to believe from UN?? And whom do you really present??
If UN is for Myanmar Citizens too, we want to hear the fair report instead of pressuring Govt or Myanmar National to accept those so called Rohingyas.
15 comments
Shwe Phyu
July 31, 2012 at 9:38 am
Forgot to mention…
If anyone wants to copy the whole or part of this post, you are most welcome…
ဦး ဂျစ်
July 31, 2012 at 9:42 am
🙄
မောင်ပေ
July 31, 2012 at 9:57 am
thank you very much shwe phyu, this word come from heart for you are understanding and standing for rakhine and myanmar
Shwe Phyu
July 31, 2012 at 10:35 am
Thank you မောင်ပေ…
ကိုသင်း
July 31, 2012 at 10:05 am
That is a right question for UN, I think and also accept that
proposal, concerned with UN. They often force to take a
pressure on countries ,undeveloped and against US and GB.
htoosan
July 31, 2012 at 11:32 am
UN ဝန်ထမ်းတွေမှာ လည်း အကောင်းဆုံးကားတွေစီး အကောင်းဆုံး အိမ်တွေမှာ ပျော်မွေ့နေ အကောင်းဆုံး ဟိုတယ်မှာ တက်စား အစည်းအဝေး လုပ်ကြရတာဆိုတော့ ဒီလို နေရာမျိုးကမှ ပိုက်ပိုက်ထွက်အောင် မလုပ်နိုင်ရင် ဘယ်ဖြစ်ပါ့မလဲကွယ်..
နံမည်ဆိုးနဲ့သတင်းကြီးပြီးသားသူဆိုတော့ နဲနဲပြောတာနဲ့တင် များများယုံပြီး ပိုက်ပိုက်များများ ရသကိုးကွဲ့။ ။
Shwe Ei
July 31, 2012 at 11:45 am
Background ကောင်းကောင်းရှိပါရဲ့နဲ့ မှန်တာကို မလုပ်ချင်ကြတာဘာသဘောပါလိမ့်နော်။ UN လိုအဖွဲ့ကြီးက စ,မှားနေရင် အခြားအဖွဲ့ပိစိလေးတွေ မှန်တာလုပ်ရင်လဲ မမြင်သာတော့ဘူးပေါ့။ 🙁
ကြောင်ဝတုတ်
July 31, 2012 at 11:51 am
အဲဒီအထဲမှာ… Give & Take ပါတယ်ဆိုတာလေးကိုဖြင့်… ဂရုပြုစေချင်ပါတယ်…
တကယ်တော့ အဲဒီကိစ္စက Management issue ပါ…
ခင်မင်လျက်-
ကြောင်ဝတုတ်
ပန်းစံပါယ်
July 31, 2012 at 4:44 pm
ဒါဆိုရင် မယုံကြည်ရသော၊ မယုံကြည်အပ်သော၊ မယုံကြည်ထိုက်သော UN ပေါ့။ ပြည်သူတွေက အစိုးရကို ထောက်ခံကြတယ်ဆိုတာကို UN အနေနဲ့ အလေးအနက်ထားစဉ်းစားသင့်ပါတယ်။
သန်းထွဋ်ဦး
July 31, 2012 at 10:24 pm
ပွင့်လင်းမြင်သာလာနိုင်ပါစေ ဆုတောင်းပါတယ်ဗျာ။
မိုက်ကယ်ဂျော်နီအောင်ပု
July 31, 2012 at 11:01 pm
အိုးးးးးးးးးးးး
ဆောဒီး
နောင်း
ဝီးအာ ဝါးတားတား
ဘီခေါ့စ်
ဘားမိ( စ် ) ပီးပိုး စပိ ပွစိပွစိ တစ်ယောက်ဒဘောက်
မိုက်ကယ်ဂျော်နီအောင်ပု
July 31, 2012 at 11:02 pm
ပုံ
UN အော်ဖစ်ဆာ
Reign
September 6, 2012 at 12:04 pm
Thank you Shwe Phyu for your letter and comments on UN. As you have mentioned, there are many aspects/perspectives in this issue. When we observe the post conflict-existence of UN in the area , we need to have institutional knowledge of the mission/project of each UN & NGO agencies and their intended beneficiaries in the area. Most of the UN and NGOs in the area came there with their respective projects which targeted mostly returnees as their beneficiaries as the apparent worse shape of conditions of those people are obvious. And it is a bit unfair to refer to all those who make disturbances as Muslims as there might be many peaceful Muslim people among residences in the area though most of the rioters are muslims. We also need to know what are the major / root causes of the issue and what make that people behave desperately in such a way. Obviously, these were terrorists acts but we should be curious why so many people involved in such a riots threatening peace , law and order at the risks of their own lives. We need a more appropriate approach to address this issue rather than clinging to narrow nationalism and need a broad-mindedness and humanitarian considerations in this issue.
Reign
September 6, 2012 at 12:12 pm
We all need to aware that when we talking middle east issue the views of Israels and Palestinians might be quite different, but there is one common ground and this is humanitarian ground. Likewise, national views and humanitarian views can be conflicted depends on situations. In the age of globalization, when we are trying to solve a problem and seek a sustainable solution, we should include humanitarian considerations which will ensure lasting peace and development.
Reign
September 6, 2012 at 12:54 pm
Please read pre-conflict instead of post-conflict in my first comment